Compare / OpenQR vs Flowcode
OpenQR vs Flowcode
Last verified:
Flowcode is the design-led choice for brand marketers: strong code design, a landing-page ("Flowpage") builder and first-party analytics, with the genuinely useful tiers paid and enterprise-priced. OpenQR is the free choice: unlimited watermark-free static codes with no account, dynamic codes and scan analytics on the free tier (1 code and 7-day history; 25 active codes and a 90-day window on Pro for £9/mo), custom design, a custom oqr.to back-half, a UTM builder, CSV bulk creation, a free API and an MCP server, all open-source.
Where OpenQR wins
- A free tier with dynamic codes, scan analytics, the UTM builder, CSV bulk create and the full API (no plan to unlock them); Pro at £9/mo lifts the cap to 25 active codes and analytics to a 90-day window; Business (£19/mo) goes further: 100 active codes and a 12-month analytics window.
- No sign-up and no watermark: generate and download a clean, designed code in your browser in seconds.
- 1 dynamic code and 7-day analytics free, where Flowcode gates dynamic codes and full analytics behind paid plans entirely.
- An open-source core you can self-host, audit or fork (no vendor lock-in).
- A built-in MCP server, so AI agents (Claude, Cursor) can create OpenQR codes directly.
Where Flowcode still leads
- Strong code design and brand templates (design is Flowcode's core strength).
- Mature Flowpage landing-page builder for richer destinations.
- Deeper first-party analytics and audience data on paid plans.
- Enterprise team controls, integrations and account management.
- Onboarding and support oriented to marketing teams.
FAQ
Is OpenQR a free alternative to Flowcode?
Yes. OpenQR's generator, UTM builder, CSV bulk creation and API are free with no plan to unlock them, and the free tier includes 1 dynamic code and 7-day scan analytics (25 active codes and a 90-day window on Pro, £9/mo). Flowcode keeps dynamic codes, full analytics and design features on paid plans.
Can OpenQR codes look as good as Flowcode's?
OpenQR gives you free control over colours, gradients, dot and corner shapes, a centre logo and framing, which is enough to produce a branded code. Flowcode goes further on guided brand templates; if design tooling is your priority and budget is not a constraint, it is the stronger choice.
Does OpenQR have a landing-page builder like Flowpage?
Not yet. A link-in-bio / hosted landing destination is on the roadmap (the data model already treats it as just another editable destination). Today you point an OpenQR dynamic code at any URL, including your own page.
Where does Flowcode still win?
In code design and brand templates, the mature Flowpage landing-page builder, deeper paid analytics, and enterprise team controls. Several of these are on OpenQR's roadmap.
Free, open-source, no sign-up to generate.